"Chance, as Conrad liked to call it---luck, or even fate, as others prefer to think---plays its part as much in shaping the destinies of races as of individuals, dispensing vicissitudes or boons alike upon the lone figure and the composite group. Of the vicissitudes the saddest, though assuredly not the most dire, is that by which the dead are relegated to oblivion. It is perhaps a subconscious awareness of this hazard that so often directs the steps of an indolent walker to an old churchyard, leading him to pause by a decayed tombstone, to wonder as he gazes at its perished and illegible inscription as to what manner of man was laid beneath the enigmatic slab, to speculate upon his way of life, and to regret that all traces of this once vital and alert being---even to the record of his name and life span---have now forever faded from the notice of mankind."
-Introduction to 'The Scythians' by Tamara Talbot Rice
I found the preceding quote as I was researching documented history regarding the ancient Scythian civilization. It seems that, due to their lack of written alphabet, the Scythian culture is one of those that were seemingly doomed to oblivion by the passage of time. While reflecting on this thought, first I rehearsed the familiar excuse to ignore such a loss, 'Angels in heaven have recorded their story, and it will be told to all when judgment time comes.' A new counter to this claim preempted my mind at this point though. The counter is a rhetorical question: "What would I do differently in my life today, if I knew what the man buried in plot Q24 of the nearest cemetery knew?"
I know, that may sound like the old adage, "Those who don't know their history are doomed to repeat it." I contend that there is a difference. The buried man probably saw troubles that could be avoided if I were privy to his experience, it is true. Additionally, however, he also had new ideas, mastery of skills and many other forms of knowledge that were much more suited to making historical moments than preventing catastrophe. With such thoughts, I stumbled through my book, searching for signs that others believed living humans to be of worth enough to document.
I didn't have to look far. Herodotus, the ancient greek historian, saw the same value in people that I had just discovered. He wrote an entire book, albeit from a strongly biased viewpoint, on the lifestyle of the Scythian nomad. Much of his writing was based on a "study abroad" that he did with them, learning about their culture first hand. He wrote of fabulous wealth, and impressive art. Until recently, most modern historians thought his writing on the subject was pure idiocy. Then, they found this and other artifacts.
Such treasure has been discovered across most of modern Russia, or in ancient terms Scythia. A massive effort has now begun, literally unearthing treasure troves, trying to sort out who these people were. Modern historians are trying to find anything they can to document these lives, tackling the question: "How long is the road back from oblivion?"
I'm going to take one little tidbit from your post not entirely related to the Scythians and run with it: the part about angels recording in heaven. Until reading that in your post, I had always imagined this process involving a book (typically one like those huge Catholic bibles) with paper. The thought then hit me that this isn't what the Israelites would have thought of if they heard the same expression. When God gave Moses the Ten Commandments, they were written in stone. So would the Israelites have imagined the angels in heaven recording earthly affairs in stone? (Mind you, I'm assuming this expression/idea was held by the Israelites, which may or may not be the case, but I think that if it did, they would certainly have imagined stone.) If so, when did God suddenly have his angels switch over to paper? Did they rewrite what had been written in stone or are there still slates up in heaven with engravings about affairs on the earth? Just some interesting questions which probably don't have answers for us to dwell on in between our efforts to understand things like how time works for God.
ReplyDeleteWe always hear that quote, "Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it". And it's true. But you're right, there was something that hit me as I read your quote. We as humans are so complex, so wonderfully unique, it's hard to do any of us justice after we have passed. A civilization lacking a written language is especially handicapped in this regard. And yet, we're going to have an opportunity to meet these people...a perspective we gain through the gospel that is quite exciting.
ReplyDeleteI am also thinking a lot about that quote about repeating history... In some ways I buy it, and in other ways I am not so sure. Of course I think that it is necessary to see how consequences unfold on levels that we hope to never have to repeat by learning from the past; however, to another extent, we are human and happen to do similar things as those of the past. That's just the way we are. We are all subject to pride, selfishness, jealousy, etc, because its easier than working hard NOT to be. So I think ultimately even if we have learned from the past, we still repeat history. And if you look back, history has been repeated and repeated and repeated. Just some food for thought.
ReplyDeleteI wonder how much knowledge has been "lost" from valuable insights that people did not write down or wrote down in a way where they weren't preserved. These insights could come from a group or individuals.. Who knows what impact they could have made? (Motivation to write in my journal. . . )
ReplyDeleteAlso, building on our class discussion today, we can learn from history but one can never learn everything possible to learn from an event in history. This is due to the beauty of individual and group application and group interpretation... Take the Holocaust for example, are genocides STILL going on today? Unfortunately, Yes. Is it because people didn't learn from past events whether through personal experience or a secondary written one? I would say yes and no. No, because like Brenda said, part of human tendencies includes desire for power and selfishness, etc. This is an interesting and scary element of human behavior. In my social psychology class today, we discussed the Zimbardo prison experiment... (see link below) An example that perfectly "normal" people can do terrible, sadistic things when placed in a role. That is a bit of a tangent, but it shows how vulnerable we as humans can be and how we might not be as good as we think we are when placed in a particular situation. . .
http://psychology.about.com/od/classicpsychologystudies/a/stanford-prison-experiment.htm
ReplyDelete